Friday, January 22, 2010

Is the Government Manipulating Stock Prices?

 

Written by The Growth Stock Wire - 1/22/10

After a 20-year career trading S&P 500 futures contracts on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, my friend Charlie suddenly retired last November.

"There was no way to protect yourself," Charlie said to me over lunch a couple weeks ago when I asked him about his unexpected decision. "This guy would walk into the pits and just start buying. It was unconventional. He'd buy at times when it really didn't make any sense – at least not to those of us who'd been around for a while. And he'd buy HUGE."

"It got to the point," Charlie continued, "that we'd have a bunch of our interns just watching the guy when he was off the floor. We'd know if he took a phone call. We'd know if he'd gone outside for a smoke. And we'd know if he started walking in the direction of the pit. That was our cue to start buying futures contracts ourselves – just to get in front of the guy.

"I knew it was time to retire," Charlie sighed, "when I started planning my trading day around this guy's bathroom breaks."

For the past 20 years, conspiracy theorists have engaged in stories about the "Plunge Protection Team" – a group of traders funded by the Fed whose sole purpose is to prop up the stock market. I never really bought into the argument, though. After all, an awful lot of people "in the know" have to stay quiet in order to keep the conspiracy going. And it's unlikely any group of people can maintain that sort of silence for two decades.

But Charlie's story got me thinking.

Then, last week, Charles Biderman, CEO of TrimTabs – one of the most respected and widely read financial research organizations – published a report that raised the possibility that the Fed is actively involved in boosting stock prices.

In the article, Mr. Biderman suggests it would only take $5 billion to $15 billion each month to buy enough S&P 500 futures contracts to boost the market 70%. Surely, with all the hundreds of billions of dollars used to prop up the real estate, auto, and banking industries, it's reasonable to suspect the Fed might use a few bucks to prop up stock prices, too.

At least it's something to think about.

I'm still not sure if I can completely buy into the whole conspiracy theory just yet. There is, however, one thing I do know for sure…

If the Fed has been actively engaged in manipulating stock prices higher, then it can manipulate them lower as well. You won't want to be the one left holding the bag when that happens.

Best regards and good trading,

Jeff Clark

Monday, January 18, 2010

Create $4,000,000 in Wealth

How to amass over $4,000,000 of tax free 
retirement and legacy benefits for only
5 cents
on the dollar



$100,000 College Fund at $25,000 per year for 4 years

$1,250,000 Retirement Supplement at $50,000 until age 90

$2,694,836 Legacy Benefit to Family or Charity

For more details call our 24 hr. recorded line:

1-800-929-1349

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

“The Rarest Achievement”

"The Rarest Achievement"

 

It's pretty rare to get an Olympic Gold Medal, wouldn't you say? Only 1,210 Americans have received one. It's unusual to climb Mt. Everest, too: Just 2,300 people have done that. But there's an even rarer category: The number of billionaires. No more than 1,125 people in the world can claim that distinction.

 

My friend, Bill Bartmann, did just that. Now keep in mind that this group of 1,125 people includes people who had major help along the way: Many were born with it, inherited it, or had every advantage while growing up.

 

In the history of billionaires, Bill Bartmann stands alone. He's the ONLY former homeless person and gang member ever to have made a billion dollars. That's right, Bill went from eating out of dumpsters and living under a bridge viaduct, to having after-tax, take-home pay in a single year of more than $100 million and being listed as the 25th richest person in America.

 

Here's where it gets extremely interesting: Bill is willing to coach YOU on how to succeed in business.

 

After all, what can you learn from someone whose daddy died and left him a billion? But it's totally different with Bill Bartmann: He worked in a slaughterhouse. He was an alcoholic at age 17. And at one point Bill was paralyzed from the waist down. Yet Bill discovered a DIFFERENT way of thinking and acting that enabled him to overcome all of that, and become a self-made billionaire.

 

After scaling the highest peaks in the business world and getting his fill of toys like $25 million aircraft, what's Bill up to now? He has one current passion: Showing others his special techniques for overcoming any challenge and being as successful as they want to be.

 

Do you think Bill might know a few things YOU could use to overcome your own challenges? What if you could get his thoughts on dozens of business topics?

 

Now you can. Bill is launching a one-of-a-kind online service, called his "Billionaire Business System". This is not some one-size-fits-all deal. Instead, Bill has built a mentoring tool that provides you with laser-targeted advice on many individual topics.

 

Are you already running a business but not sure what's the best way to secure financing for your next stage of growth? Bill covers that topic. Not even sure if business is right for you? Bill has a video session just about that.

 

In fact, the Billionaire Business System currently has almost two dozen topics, and is constantly growing.

 

I strongly recommend that you take a look at Bill's system and see for yourself how it can remove whatever roadblocks are in your way to greater business success. You can find it by going to: http://www.BillionaireU.com/go.aspx?AID=15285

Name me anywhere else on the planet that you can get specific, useful, and comprehensive business-building advice from a self-made billionaire? That's OK, I can't think of any, either.

 

The sooner you have Bill Bartmann in your corner, advising you on business success, the sooner you can sit back and bask in your own dreams coming true.

 

To Your Success,

 

Andre

 

P.S. The chances are really good that whatever challenges you have, Bill's been there, and found a way to overcome them. Let Bill show you how, by taking the easy step of going to

http://www.BillionaireU.com/go.aspx?AID=15285

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Poor Obama. The man is in way over his head. And what can he do? Few people understand what is going on in the economy...and none of them work for the Obama administration, as near as we can tell. The only one who seemed to be on the ball was his advisor, Paul Volcker. But Volcker got edged out by Larry Summers, a man with a long history of bad ideas on economic matters.

 

Summers is a stalwart member of that very special club - modern economists. Never has an unarmed professional group done more damage to a society than Summers and his colleagues.

 

"We cannot and will not accept any speed limit on American growth," said Summers in a 1995 speech, rejecting the idea of higher interest rates to cool speculation. By 2000, the economy with no speed limit had smashed into an abutment. But Summers never figured out what the problem was. He was too busy wrecking a great university. He went on to apply the same 'no speed limit' philosophy to Harvard, where his building program was so costly the university years will probably never recover from it.

 

Ben Bernanke gives no hint that he has any idea of what is going on either. He maintains that modern central banking can't see when economies are getting into trouble. But when they do...he knows just what to do to fix it.

 

What kind of strange GPS system is this, dear reader? It failed to tell us where we were before we ran off the cliff... But now, we're going to use it to find our way home. Good luck!

 

But who worries now? We're rolling along...convinced that trouble is behind us. Recovery is on the way; that's what the signs say.

 

But wait...

 

Joblessness at a 26-year high, and rising....

 

Consumer credit just took the biggest monthly drop ever...it's fallen 10 months in a row.

 

Nearly half of Florida's mortgages are underwater...

 

Hey...what a recovery!

 

But the stock market doesn't seem to care. Or notice.

 

The Dow rose 45 points yesterday. Investors seem to think that businesses are going to make a lot of money in the years ahead. How? How much stuff can you sell to unemployed people? But why else would investors pay 100 times earnings for a share?

 

The current price/earnings ratio is a subject of much discussion. Earnings collapsed in the depression. Prices did not. So if you look just at current earnings you come to a P/E ratio in the 100+ range. That means investors pay $100 for every dollar's worth of earnings. If they intend to earn their money back - and nothing changes - they'll wait a century to break even.

 

But earnings are expected to go up. So Robert Shiller used a 10-year moving average to compute earnings...smoothing them out to a "normal" level. Still, he says, the S&P 500 is overvalued by about 27%.

 

The point is, stocks are expensive. So, you have to wonder: what is going on? Are stock market investors really such optimists?

 

Or, is the federal government manipulating stock prices? It is spending trillions of dollars to give people the impression that things are getting back to normal. Why not spend a few billion more to manipulate stock prices?

 

We don't know. The feds have shown themselves willing to do any fool thing...but rigging the stock market? Who knows?

 

We've got to reckon with what we've got. And what we've got is a stock market that is either manipulated...or delusional.

 

Stocks could only be worth current prices if this were a normal recession. But if this were a normal recession, it would be over by now. Stocks would be moving up in anticipation of the next boom phase. But this is not a normal recession. And it hasn't come to an end. New jobs aren't being created. Consumer credit is not expanding. And the only prices that are going up are the prices subject to speculation.

 

The real reason stocks are so expensive (assuming the market isn't rigged) is that this is the beginning of a depression, not the end of one. At the beginning, people don't quite believe it.

 

"We're climbing out of a nasty recession," said a financial expert interviewed on the radio this morning. "And we're all happy to put this thing behind us as soon as possible."

 

Stocks are high because people think they can 'put this thing behind them.' They can't imagine that the depression will last for 5...10...maybe 15 more years. Nor do they realize that the US economy is permanently impaired...that the companies traded on Wall Street will have a very hard time earning profits in the years ahead...nor that the average American family may have reached the height of its wealth in 1973!

 

The disappointment will come...then the disillusionment...then the disgust...then the despair. It will be like walking down a staircase...each step heavier...deeper...and more depressing the last. And with each step, stocks will fall. Investors will begin to see things in a new way. And at the bottom, a whole new outlook will be common:

 

"America is finished as an economic power," people will say. "Incomes are going down - forever; we can't compete with the Chinese. Stocks were dreadfully overpriced; now they are cheap...but who would want to buy them?"

 

It may not happen like that. But somehow, some day...stocks will once again trade at low P/E ratios... Below 10...maybe down to 5. Then, they will be bargains.

 

How will you know when it is time to buy again? When you no longer want to.Poor Obama. The man is in way over his head. And what can he do? Few people understand what is going on in the economy...and none of them work for the Obama administration, as near as we can tell. The only one who seemed to be on the ball was his advisor, Paul Volcker. But Volcker got edged out by Larry Summers, a man with a long history of bad ideas on economic matters.

 

Summers is a stalwart member of that very special club - modern economists. Never has an unarmed professional group done more damage to a society than Summers and his colleagues.

 

"We cannot and will not accept any speed limit on American growth," said Summers in a 1995 speech, rejecting the idea of higher interest rates to cool speculation. By 2000, the economy with no speed limit had smashed into an abutment. But Summers never figured out what the problem was. He was too busy wrecking a great university. He went on to apply the same 'no speed limit' philosophy to Harvard, where his building program was so costly the university years will probably never recover from it.

 

Ben Bernanke gives no hint that he has any idea of what is going on either. He maintains that modern central banking can't see when economies are getting into trouble. But when they do...he knows just what to do to fix it.

 

What kind of strange GPS system is this, dear reader? It failed to tell us where we were before we ran off the cliff... But now, we're going to use it to find our way home. Good luck!

 

But who worries now? We're rolling along...convinced that trouble is behind us. Recovery is on the way; that's what the signs say.

 

But wait...

 

Joblessness at a 26-year high, and rising....

 

Consumer credit just took the biggest monthly drop ever...it's fallen 10 months in a row.

 

Nearly half of Florida's mortgages are underwater...

 

Hey...what a recovery!

 

But the stock market doesn't seem to care. Or notice.

 

The Dow rose 45 points yesterday. Investors seem to think that businesses are going to make a lot of money in the years ahead. How? How much stuff can you sell to unemployed people? But why else would investors pay 100 times earnings for a share?

 

The current price/earnings ratio is a subject of much discussion. Earnings collapsed in the depression. Prices did not. So if you look just at current earnings you come to a P/E ratio in the 100+ range. That means investors pay $100 for every dollar's worth of earnings. If they intend to earn their money back - and nothing changes - they'll wait a century to break even.

 

But earnings are expected to go up. So Robert Shiller used a 10-year moving average to compute earnings...smoothing them out to a "normal" level. Still, he says, the S&P 500 is overvalued by about 27%.

 

The point is, stocks are expensive. So, you have to wonder: what is going on? Are stock market investors really such optimists?

 

Or, is the federal government manipulating stock prices? It is spending trillions of dollars to give people the impression that things are getting back to normal. Why not spend a few billion more to manipulate stock prices?

 

We don't know. The feds have shown themselves willing to do any fool thing...but rigging the stock market? Who knows?

 

We've got to reckon with what we've got. And what we've got is a stock market that is either manipulated...or delusional.

 

Stocks could only be worth current prices if this were a normal recession. But if this were a normal recession, it would be over by now. Stocks would be moving up in anticipation of the next boom phase. But this is not a normal recession. And it hasn't come to an end. New jobs aren't being created. Consumer credit is not expanding. And the only prices that are going up are the prices subject to speculation.

 

The real reason stocks are so expensive (assuming the market isn't rigged) is that this is the beginning of a depression, not the end of one. At the beginning, people don't quite believe it.

 

"We're climbing out of a nasty recession," said a financial expert interviewed on the radio this morning. "And we're all happy to put this thing behind us as soon as possible."

 

Stocks are high because people think they can 'put this thing behind them.' They can't imagine that the depression will last for 5...10...maybe 15 more years. Nor do they realize that the US economy is permanently impaired...that the companies traded on Wall Street will have a very hard time earning profits in the years ahead...nor that the average American family may have reached the height of its wealth in 1973!

 

The disappointment will come...then the disillusionment...then the disgust...then the despair. It will be like walking down a staircase...each step heavier...deeper...and more depressing the last. And with each step, stocks will fall. Investors will begin to see things in a new way. And at the bottom, a whole new outlook will be common:

 

"America is finished as an economic power," people will say. "Incomes are going down - forever; we can't compete with the Chinese. Stocks were dreadfully overpriced; now they are cheap...but who would want to buy them?"

 

It may not happen like that. But somehow, some day...stocks will once again trade at low P/E ratios... Below 10...maybe down to 5. Then, they will be bargains.

 

How will you know when it is time to buy again? When you no longer want to.

Bill Bonner

The Biggest Financial Deception of the Decade

The Biggest Financial Deception of the Decade

By Jeff Clark

Stowe, Vermont

 

Enron? Bear Stearns? Bernie Madoff? They're all big stories about big losses and have hurt a lot of employees and investors. But none come close to getting my vote for the decade's most dastardly deception...

 

First came Enron, with $65.5 billion in assets, going belly-up and becoming the largest bankruptcy in US history at that time. The stock went from a high of $84.63 in December 2000 to a whopping 26¢ one year later. And what had we been told by the media? Fortune magazine dubbed Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years.

 

Next came WorldCom filing for bankruptcy in 2002, their assets of $103.9 billion dwarfing Enron's. Tyco, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems...also made headlines for their acts of fraud and mismanagement.

 

A few years later, Bear Stearns set us all up for the Big Meltdown of 2008. It was B.S. (no, I mean Bear Stearns) that pioneered the asset- backed securities markets, and we all know how that turned out. Later we learned that as losses mounted in 2006 and 2007, the company was actually adding to its exposure of mortgage-backed assets. With net equity of $11.1 billion supporting $395 billion in assets, Bear leveraged itself up to an astonishing 35-to-1.

 

And during it all, Bear Stearns was recognized as the "Most Admired" securities firm in a survey by Fortune magazine (there's that Lower Manhattan tabloid darling again). Frequent sightings of company executives on country club fairways assured the public that all was well. And CEO Alan Schwartz told us there was "no liquidity crisis for the firm" and insisted he "had the numbers to back it up." His company was sold four days later to JPMorgan Chase at $10 per share, a 92% loss from its $133.20 high.

 

Lehman Brothers, the 158-year-old investment bank, was next and still today holds the title as the largest bankruptcy in US history. L.B. succumbed to 2007's Word of the Year, "subprime," and its $600 billion in assets all went poof! In just the first half of 2008, before the meltdown, Lehman's stock slid 73%.

 

And what did CEO Dick Fuld tell us in April of that year? "I will hurt the shorts, and that is my goal." He must have been referring to the attire of his tennis club buddies, because the ones who actually got hurt were numerous other banks, money market funds, institutions, hedge funds, REITs, brokers, private and public trusts, foundations, government agencies, foreign governments, employees, and investors.

 

Moving on to the largest US government bailout recipient by far, AIG's troubles spawned my favorite placard of the decade: seen outside their Manhattan offices stood a sign that simply read, "Jump!" Maybe its creator heard what I did from AIG's financial products head Joseph Cassano: "It is hard for us, without being flippant, to even see a scenario within any kind of realm of reason that would see us losing one dollar in any of these [credit default swap] transactions."

 

Oops!

 

Topping off our list of the infamous debacles of the decade is Bernie Made-off (er, Madoff), who scammed $65 billion over 20 years from unsuspecting institutions and wealthy investors...

 

By now you are probably wondering... What's bigger than all these debacles? He's covered the major frauds and scams of the past decade - what could possibly be left?

 

To quote my favorite sleuth, Hercule Poirot, "When all the facts are laid before me, the solution becomes inevitable."

 

Here are a few clues...

 

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said on July 16, 2008, that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are "adequately capitalized" and "in no danger of failing." Then-Secretary Treasurer Henry Paulson declared on August 10, 2008, "We have no plans to insert money into either of those two institutions."

 

- Both Fannie and Freddie were nationalized 28 days later, on September 8, 2008.

 

Ben Bernanke claimed on February 28, 2008, "Among the largest banks, the capital ratios remain good and I don't expect any serious problems of that sort among the large, internationally active banks..." Henry Paulson added on July 20, 2008, that "It's a safe banking system, a sound banking system. Our regulators are on top of it. This is a very manageable situation."

 

- Since the recession started in December, 2008, 144 banks have failed.

 

Paulson informed us on April 20, 2007, that "All the signs I look at show the housing market is at or near the bottom."

 

- The number of foreclosures skyrocketed shortly thereafter and will now any day surpass those during the Great Depression.

 

Ben Bernanke announced on June 20, 2007, that "[The sub prime fallout] will not affect the economy overall."

 

- Less than one year later, the stock market crashed, losing 53% of its value, and is still down 25% despite one of the biggest bounces in history.

 

Those in charge of our country's finances not only failed to see the crises developing and then bungled the handling of the recovery, they've deliberately misled us about what they're doing to our currency. In spite of emphatic promises, flowery speeches, pat-on-the- back assurances, and continual reassurances, here's what they've actually done to the dollar:

 

 

Since September 1, 2008, the monetary base has ballooned from $908 billion to $2.0 trillion. The current monetary base is now equal to bailing out General Motors 23 times.

Bailout funds in 2008 and 2009 total $8.1 trillion. That's almost 78 WorldComs. It's over 123 Enrons.

US debt has risen sharply, from $6.2 trillion in 2002 to $12.1 trillion today. That's over $39,000 per citizen.

David Walker, the comptroller general of the Government Accountability Office from 1998-2008, warned that the US is on the hook for $60 trillion in unfunded liabilities. Independent analysts peg the figure at near twice that. Whatever the number, it is incomprehensibly large. The only way we will meet these liabilities is to print the money and inflate them away.

We're bailing out corporations that should fail, making financial promises we can't keep, and adding layers of debt we can't possibly repay. And the real killer is, if we don't have the cash, we just print it. It is, by any reasonable account, the "blunder that will plunder" the next several generations. It is changing America permanently, and the problems will persist long after you and I are laid to rest.

 

Bottom line: after all the bailout programs, housing initiatives, rescue efforts, stimulus schemes, bank takeovers, wars, unemployment benefit extensions, and numerous other promises, the biggest financial deception of the decade is what the US government is doing to the dollar. Nothing else even comes close.

 

This reckless activity has spooked our foreign creditors, weakened our global standing, diluted our currency, is punishing savers and retirees, and ultimately sets us up for a level of inflation this country has never seen before.

 

Yet, what is the guardian of our economy and money telling us now?

 

"Will the Federal Reserve's actions to combat the crisis lead to higher inflation down the road? The answer is no; the Federal Reserve is committed to keeping inflation low and will be able to do so. In the near term, elevated unemployment and stable inflation expectations should keep inflation subdued, and indeed, inflation could move lower from here." (Ben Bernanke, December 7, 2009).

 

This is pure rubbish. If inflation could be controlled by just thinking stable inflation thoughts, then Ben should be able to grow a full head of hair by just thinking scalp follicle thoughts. This is so ridiculous, it's insulting.

 

Government actions make a mockery of their words; what they say and what they do are diametrically opposed. It's clear that inflation is not a question of "if," but "when."

 

Any level-headed individual has to conclude that there will be a steady - and likely accelerating - decline in the dollar's purchasing power. It's inevitable.

 

The great masses don't quite understand it yet, but they will. There will be no escape from the cold, hard slap in the face citizens will receive when a high level of inflation arrives. And when it does, it will make a mockery of any opposing viewpoint.

 

So the question before you is simple: Will you be a prepared survivor for what lies ahead, despite what our government leaders tell us, or will you be a complacent victim of the biggest financial deception of the decade?

 

For me, there's only one solution. Don't kid yourself into thinking a man-made asset will protect your purchasing power. This is the time to be overweight gold and silver. I advise letting them serve their purpose for you.

 

Regards,

 

Jeff Clark

for The Daily Reckoning

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Foggy Crystal Balls

 

 

It's a good thing that advisors aren't paid to predict the future because, well, nobody

seems to be doing a very good job of it lately. I hope you'll remember this as all the

major financial magazines come out with their yearly "Here's what will happen in 2010"

cover stories.

Reading through some back issues, we find that at this time two years ago, nobody,

anywhere, was predicting a 4th quarter meltdown in the investment markets, or the

global economy tottering on the edge of disaster. In fact, not a one of the

prognosticators seems to have realized that the U.S. economy had already fallen into a

recession.

If you read the magazine issues in early September, right before the markets suddenly

went into a 400-point free-fall in two trading days (triggered, you probably remember, by

the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the AIG bailout and the federal rescue of Fannie Mae

and Freddie Mac), you realize that nobody had a clue that a storm was brewing on the

horizon. The Wall Street Journal talked confidently about Lehman's efforts to secure a

line of credit or divest some assets, and the consensus seemed to be that the damage

from the burst housing bubble had been safely contained. Postmortem articles about

the crisis show that the Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury

Secretary Hank Paulson, who both watch the economic numbers DAILY, were caught

totally flat-footed.

Closer to home, in January of 2009, economists and pundits were talking about the

possibility of a sustained market drop similar to the slow investment torture the

Japanese have experienced since 1989. Kiplinger's magazine identified the people

who had been most right in their 2008 predictions and asked them what they thought

was going to happen in 2009. Not a one of them predicted what actually happened: a

dramatic rise in stock prices (the S&P 500 touched bottom on March 6 with an intraday

price of 666.79 and rose to over 1,100 currently), a sharp (albeit temporary) rise in the

dollar and an end to the economic recession--what economists are now describing as a

jobless recovery.

Here's what they actually said. David Tice, chief equity strategist for Federated

Investors, told the magazine's readers that "The dollar will decline, and it's very possible

that inflation will pick up. The S&P 500 index could easily fall to 450 or so. This will be a

longer-term decline," he added, and gave the worst advice possible for investors over

the next three quarters, saying that "Investors should be selling equities and conserving

cash."

Bob Rodriguez and Tom Atteberry, of First Pacific Advisors, confidently predicted that:

"The upturn won't come until 2010, and when it does, it will look very sluggish and

lethargic."

Economist Nouriel Roubini told Kiplinger readers: "I expect that the recession will be

very severe and that it won't be over before the end of 2009. I think there is a further

15% to 20% downside risk for global and U.S. stocks, and a further 15% to 20%

downside risk for commodity prices. So 2009 will be a year of recession and deflation."

Peter Schiff, president of Euro Pacific Capital, missed the appreciation of the dollar, the

dramatically low interest rates and the economic recovery--all in a couple of sentences.

"The dollar is going to resume its fall," he said, "leading to a resurgence in the bull

market in commodities. That will pierce the bubble in the bond market, causing interest

rates to go up. So we're going to be in a depressionary environment, but with rising

prices and rising interest rates. Our economy will be a mess for years and years to

come."

The worst advice was being given right at the bottom in March, when global stock prices

were about to reward patient investors with an amazing rally. Consider this evaluation

from the March 5 issue of Business Week magazine:

All told, more than $10 trillion of stock market wealth has vanished, and with it the

confidence that springs from financial security. "We are looking at a 60% to 70%

chance that this bear market is not over," says Robert D. Arnott, chairman of Research

Affiliates, a Pasadena (Calif.) firm that manages $25 billion.

The article went on to predict "more debt busts and government trial and error until

things get set right again. That could mean two more years of bouncing around and

then another six or so before the Dow is back above 14,000. Not long ago, such an

outcome would have seemed unimaginably bleak. Given the other possibilities, it

doesn't seem so bad now."

The hardest part about investing is controlling the natural urge to sell when the market

has cratered, or to buy when the market is euphoric. But that's like going to the mall

and waiting to buy until all the sales are over and prices have gone up, and then, as

soon as the store has its next 25% off sale, going back and selling whatever you

bought. Nobody would even think of doing that with their holiday gift purchases, but it's

normal behavior in the investment markets.

The unhappy truth is that nobody can foresee the future, and the investment markets

tend to be far less predictable than other areas of our lives. Like it or not, we venture

blindly forth every day, control what we can control (investment costs, taxes and

savings rates), and generally make more money in the upturns than we lose in the

downturns. Years ago, a pundit threw up his hands and said: "I don't know what the

markets will do tomorrow, or next week, or next month. But I do know, with certainty,

which direction the next 100% movement in the markets will be."

There, finally, is a prediction I can endorse.

 

© Copyright 2009, Advisor Perspectives, Inc. All rights reserved.